search
Barnsley
Batley
Bedale
Beverley
Bingley
Bradford
Bridlington
Brighouse
Castleford
Catterick Garrison
Cleckheaton
Cottingham
Darlington
Dewsbury
Doncaster
Driffield
Elland
Filey
Goole
Guisborough
Halifax
Harrogate
Hawes
Hebden Bridge
Heckmondwike
Hessle
Holmfirth
Huddersfield
Hull
Ilkley
Keighley
Knaresborough
Knottingley
Leeds
Leyburn
Liversedge
Malton
Mexborough
Middlesborough
Mirfield
Morley
Normanton
Northallerton
Ossett
Otley
Pickering
Pontetfract
Pudsey
Redcar
Richmond
Ripon
Rotherham
Saltburn-by-the-Sea
Scarborough
Selby
Settle
Sheffield
Shipley
Skipton
Sowerby Bridge
Stockton-on-Tees
Tadcaster
Thirsk
Todmorden
Wakefield
Wetherby
Whitby
Yarm
York
Debate Over Pre-nups Reopens As Bankrupt Porter Bags Divorce Windfall
Peter Jones, Founder, Jones Myers
The case of a bankrupt hotel porter who was awarded a £1.3 million divorce payout from his wealthy wife has reignited the debate over whether pre-nups in England & Wales hold their weight in court.

A judge ruled that a pre-nup agreement signed by Anil Ipekci two weeks before marrying Morgan McConnell, the great-granddaughter of Avon cosmetics founder David McConnell, was unfair and would leave him penniless. As a result Mr Ipekci - a bankrupt when he met his ex wife - has received the £1.3 million windfall to buy a house and pay off his credit card, bank debts and unpaid legal fees.

It is important to stress that this scenario is highly unusual. Although still not legally binding in England and Wales, in the majority of cases pre-nups are widely accepted as the sensible way for couples to avoid the potential distress, acrimony and expense associated with resolving financial matters, should their relationship end.

Also by Peter Jones...
Jeff Bezos, Social Media And Divorce
The Pitfalls Regarding Divorce, Retirement And Pension Share Orders
Unique And Special: Relationships Between Grandparents And Grandchildren
Why No-Fault Divorce Is In Children’s Best Interests
Why We Should Celebrate Mums Every Day Of The Year
Their increasing popularity reflects how couples view their open and transparent nature as a positive factor when planning their wedding. Far from castigating the agreements as clinical and unromantic, more couples are demonstrating that while seeking to protect inherited or family money, they also want to do ‘the right thing’ by each other – and by any children. We are also seeing more clients seeking to include arrangements for their beloved pets in a pre-nup.

Situations where such contracts run into problems include when judges think they have been signed in haste and under pressure. They will want to know that the partner with the most to lose understood the agreement, was not under duress when they signed it, and took independent legal advice. Courts may ignore or vary pre-nups drawn up in haste.

It is advisable that the agreement is signed at least 21 days before the wedding, making full financial disclosure and securing good legal advice.
If respected family lawyers help draw up the agreement, judges can be confident that both parties understood it fully - and were not rushed into it.

Debate Over Pre-nups Reopens As Bankrupt Porter Bags Divorce Windfall, 1st June 2019, 6:06 AM