search
Barnsley
Batley
Bedale
Beverley
Bingley
Bradford
Bridlington
Brighouse
Castleford
Catterick Garrison
Cleckheaton
Cottingham
Darlington
Dewsbury
Doncaster
Driffield
Elland
Filey
Goole
Guisborough
Halifax
Harrogate
Hawes
Hebden Bridge
Heckmondwike
Hessle
Holmfirth
Huddersfield
Hull
Ilkley
Keighley
Knaresborough
Knottingley
Leeds
Leyburn
Liversedge
Malton
Mexborough
Middlesborough
Mirfield
Morley
Normanton
Northallerton
Ossett
Otley
Pickering
Pontetfract
Pudsey
Redcar
Richmond
Ripon
Rotherham
Saltburn-by-the-Sea
Scarborough
Selby
Settle
Sheffield
Shipley
Skipton
Sowerby Bridge
Stockton-on-Tees
Tadcaster
Thirsk
Todmorden
Wakefield
Wetherby
Whitby
Yarm
York
Campaigners Hit Back At Tunnel “Vandalism”
No2 shaft - photo by Four By Three
The Society seeking to reopen a disused West Yorkshire railway tunnel as a cycle path has condemned Highways England for “unlawfully abusing emergency powers” to infill a ventilation shaft, blocking the passageway beneath it.

Queensbury Tunnel, extending for 1.4 miles between Bradford and Halifax, has been at the centre of a long-running dispute over its future. Highways England, who manage the Victorian structure on the Department for Transport’s behalf, has applied for planning permission to abandon it due to perceived safety concerns. However the application, which has so far attracted almost 4,200 objections, has not yet been determined.

Earlier this month, preparatory works had to be suspended after the tunnel was inundated with floodwater during a prolonged period of heavy rain. According to a Highways England spokesman, “water began to enter the tunnel at an unprecedented volume and speed” and “endangered the safety of our workforce” who “had to abandon equipment and move to a safe area”. However a report by the Queensbury Tunnel Society indicates that the water level in the tunnel only rose by an average of 4.6cm - less than 2 inches - per hour.

No2 shaft - photo by Four By Three
On Monday (21st October), Highways England started to infill a 99-metre deep ventilation shaft due to “fears it could collapse”. In 2012, a defect was recorded in the tunnel’s sidewall close to the shaft, but a planned repair to resist any further movement was never carried out. The supporting section of lining directly below the shaft was laser-scanned in August 2018 and found to have changed very little since construction in the 1870s. No evidence has been produced to suggest any deterioration over the past 14 months.

Graeme Bickerdike, Engineering Co-ordinator for the Queensbury Tunnel Society, said:
“For rising water to keep up with someone walking in the tunnel, the ingress rate would have to reach about 46,000 litres per second. The actual rate was 72 litres per second. Whilst that’s considerable, it’s certainly not unprecedented; something similar happened in January 2016. But the suggestion that either staff or equipment were in any way at risk is just another example of Highways England’s ridiculous hyperbole.

“Both the shaft and the supporting tunnel lining are in generally Fair condition. Even if the defective area did fail, there’s no plausible mechanism whereby any effect could be felt at ground level. Load paths from the shaft would redistribute through unaffected parts of the tunnel lining and, more importantly, the shaft lining itself was built in two separate sections, with the upper portion independently supported on a rock ledge 39 metres below ground level.”

No2 shaft - photo by Forgotten Relics
Norah McWilliam, leader of the Queensbury Tunnel Society, said:
“This is nothing short of ruthless vandalism on Highways England’s part.

“For the past six years, we’ve worked tirelessly to secure this fabulous historic asset as an active travel route, but our efforts have been persistently blighted by Highways England’s failings. Once again, their car-crash abandonment scheme has almost been sunk by flooding, so they’ve now resorted to unlawfully abusing emergency powers to keep it afloat. There is no emergency situation at this shaft; in fact there’s no real situation of any kind there.

“If these civil servants think they can get the better of us by attempting to circumvent statutory planning processes, they can think again. This is not over. In fact we’ve been advised that the material being tipped down the shaft could be removed and used as the foundations for the cycle track.”

A spokesperson for Bradford Council said:
“The Council is pressing DfT and Highways England for the necessary authorisation or other legal basis for their works and taking external advice on its options.”

Campaigners Hit Back At Tunnel “Vandalism”, 26th October 2019, 12:45 PM